A former director of the US Mint thinks that the market will gravitate toward these solutions
A panel discussion atĀ COSMĀ explored the future of crypto currencies like Bitcoin and blockchain technologies in general. What might they mean for global money, global security, and internet architecture?
The panel, moderated byĀ WiredĀ contributing editorĀ Spencer Reiss,Ā comprised futuristĀ George Gilder,Ā Steve Forbes,Ā Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of Forbes Media,Ā Ed Moy,Ā former Director of the U.S. Mint, andĀ William Dembski,Ā mathematician, entrepreneur, and philosopher:
Can Crypto and Blockchain Reverse the Tech Decline (and Enable an Internet Renaissance)?
Here are some snatches from the dialogue (aired September 11, 2020):
George Gilder (on whatās wrong with the internet):
“Itās a broken paradigm. How do you tell a broken paradigm? The more money you spend on it, the worse it gets. Last year, we had a billion breaches of private data. This year, weāre spending roughly 20-30% more on internet security and weāre on track for three billion breaches. To have IP addresses is like having public keys with no private keys. Itās a failed foundation for a secure system. And we have a solution in the new cryptographic inventions that blockchain epitomizes.”
Steve Forbes (on the challenge of disruptive technologies in general, citing his industry as an example):Ā
“When we started our electronic publishing in the mid-90s, most publishers thought you just took a printed page and put it on line. And that was electronic publishing. That was like, when Edison and others invented film 120 years ago. Some people thought that a fature film was like filming a stage play. No. Very different medium. One of the first things we did was separate Forbes.com from Forbes Magazine. Separate staff, separate buildings, separate support systems. We wanted the baby away from the rollover of the mother. The other thing we did was, we went beyond the content ofĀ ForbesĀ Magazine. We used a lot of outside content. We didnāt restrict ourselves to what appeared inĀ ForbesĀ Magazine.”
(Later, Forbes tried combining the two operations but found it extremely difficult.Ā Steve ForbesĀ āItās amazing how difficult it is to combine two different cultures.ā)
Steve Forbes:Ā “One of the things about these kinds of transitions is that there is no play book, no formula, no painting by the numbersā¦ when a disruptive technology comes along, what do you do? You donāt know what to do. You are experimenting constantly.”
Ed MoyĀ (on how cryptocurrency and blockchain could become part of everyday transactions):
“First of all, I hope government doesnāt lead it because we will all be in trouble then. When you look at fiat currency, fiat currency is in essence the governmentās monopoly on money and Iām not familiar with that many monopolists who are willing to voluntarily give up their monopolist position. And so government has a vested interest in keeping the system the way it is. The reason I went from an āold moneyā guy to the future of where I think money can go is that this is a private sector alternative to governmentās monopoly. I donāt ever see this as a complete substitution where governments give up their monopolyā¦ but I do think that the market will gravitate toward these solutions.
Further:Ā Chair of Forbes Media says money isĀ about trust.Ā Experts forecast the future of money in general at COSM. Will money be ārealā inĀ an information society?Ā Now that Facebook is proposing Libra, a cryptocurrency, this might be a good time to ask.”
Jay RichardsāsĀ interviewĀ withĀ William DembskiĀ at COSM (aired June 26, 2020) asking,
“Is it possible to create a decentralized, information-based currency?ā Dembski offers a thought experiment: āCan you, as a lone individual, create currency that is going to then be created by the individual, but will have legitimacy? That will have intrinsic value rather than depending on some sort of fiat authority trust. And so that was the thought experiment. And it uses some insights from Bitcoin, but I think it goes much further. So I need a blockchain, I need a computation to be scarce. And when I get those certain minimal assumptions, I need to have hashing where youāve got these one way functions that really mix things up. And if Iāve got public key cryptography, it seems I can get a system thatās very minimal infrastructure. I just need a blockchain that keeps the blocks in an order. No backdating. Thatās the problemā¦”
Ī Ī·Ī³Ī®:Ā https://mindmatters.ai/2020/10/are-crypto-and-blockchain-key-to-a-tech-renaissance/